This site shows a whole essay as an example of just how to structure your articles
Example essay that is academic
Example essay that is academic The Death Penalty. This essay shows many features that are important commonly appear in essays.
If the death penalty be restored in the united kingdom?
The restoration of this death penalty for serious crimes is an issue of debate in britain due to the rise that is recent violent crime. The reasons, effects and approaches to the problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues which are further complicated in addition that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime in order to increase circulation and this makes discussion that is objective difficult. This essay will examine this topic firstly by taking into consideration the arguments put forward by those who work in favour regarding the death penalty after which by taking a look at the arguments opposed to the theory.
The primary arguments in favour of restoring the death penalty are the ones of deterrence and retribution: the theory is the fact that people will be dissuaded from violent crime that they gave out to others if they know they will face the ultimate punishment and that people should face the same treatment. Statistics show that whenever the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we must consider the possibility that other reasons might have lead to this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims it is impossible to prove that capital punishment is a higher deterrent than being given a life sentence in prison and therefore “evidence….gives no support towards the evidence hypothesis theory.” It appears at best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The concept of ‘retribution’ is an interesting one: there is a basic appeal in the straightforward phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument when he says that killers give up their rights once they kill and therefore then it shows that we undervalue the right to live if punishments are too lenient. There are more points too in support of the death penalty, one of these simple cost that is being. It is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply rather than feed and house them for many years on end.
The arguments against the death penalty are mainly ethical in their nature, it sends out the wrong message to the rest of the country that it is basically wrong to kill and that when the state kills. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. This is certainly an argument that is interesting can you teach children not to ever hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead show them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? There is also the truth that you might execute innocent people. Innocent people can invariably be released from prison essay writer, nonetheless they can’t ever be brought back through the dead. When anyone have already been killed there isn’t any chance of rehabilitation or criminals trying to make up for crimes. Because of this good reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).
In closing, the arguments put forward by people who support or are resistant to the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences therefore the real way folks are brought up and they are unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It really is interesting that in this country many people are in favour of the death penalty yet parliament continues to oppose it. In this instance it might be argued that parliament is leading the way in upholding human rights and continues to broadcast the message that is clear killing is always wrong.
You ought to be in a position to observe that this essay consists of:
An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why the topic is interesting and relevant.
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the difficulties and issues active in the topic.
3. An overview of this essay.
Main paragraphs with:
1. A topic sentence which gives a main idea/argument which informs us what the complete paragraph is mostly about.
2. Evidence from outside sources which offer the argument(s) put forward in the topic sentence.
3. Some input that is personal the author analysing the points put forward within the topic sentence additionally the outside sources.
Summarises the points that are main gives a response into the question.